Criminal Doctors, The Denial Of Informed Consent, and Violation of Global Law
It’s been seventy years since the most important document regarding medical research was established, yet physicians all over the world are guilty of
violating the historic global law.
Code (1947) was established after the war crimes of Josef Mengele and
other deranged doctors who tortured, maimed, and murdered thousands of children in maniacal medical experiments during World War II, and is recognized as the most significant ethics statute in history, as well as
a vital precedent given current instances of genocide and other crimes against humanity.
The first clause of the code states that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is
absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of
any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject
matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”
This is the basis of informed consent, a legal right that physicians all over the nation are deliberately withholding from their patients as far as vaccination information is
Many doctors are guilty of bullying, threatening, and deceiving parents to bolster vaccination rates, some going so far as to kick out the non-compliers.
Let’s remember that doctors receive
compensation for high vaccination rates: the more vaccinated children in a medical practice, the bigger the bonus for the doctor.
Even more concerning is the fact that a great majority of doctors are failing to provide the following information to parents before vaccinating their
children. Instead of offering full disclosure on vaccination risks, toxic
ingredients, the existence of a vaccine injury compensation
program, or the fact that the CDC falsifies data to further their vaccine agenda, parents are given a cherry-picked fact sheet, usually on an 8×10 piece of fluorescent
This is what true informed consent regarding vaccines would look like. Anything less than the full disclosure of this information is the denial of voluntary
consent in one of the most dangerous medical experiments in history and a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code:
(The following information on informed consent was provided courtesy of HealthFreedomFlorida.org
and written by Toni Krehel.)
1. Vaccines have known, documented risks for injury and deaths. The federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has paid out over $3 billion in vaccine
injury claims, representing only a small percentage of actual damages.
2. Vaccines are categorized as a “public health” initiative, so they are not subject to the same safety standards and
double-blind studies as other pharmaceuticals are.
3. The Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS) provided by the Centers for Disease Control under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act that doctors are required to give to parents/patients, is incomplete. The VIS does not provide the parent/patient with all the possible short and long-term adverse effects related to
• Acute Encephalopathy (brain inflammation)
• Chronic Nervous System Dysfunction (brain damage)
• Anaphylaxis (massive life-threatening allergic reaction)
• Febrile Seizures (convulsions with fever)
• Guillain Barre’ Syndrome (peripheral nerve inflammation/damage, paralysis)
• Brachial Neuritis (arm nerve inflammation), Deltoid Bursitis (shoulder inflammation)
• Acute and Chronic Arthritis (joint inflammation)
• Thrombocytopenia (blood coagulation disorder)
• Syncope (sudden loss of consciousness/fainting)
• Hypotonic/Hyporesponsive Episodes (shock and “unusual shock-like state:)
• Protracted, inconsolable crying and screaming (encephalitic cry)
• Vaccine Strain Infection (smallpox, polio, measles, varicella zoster vaccines)
4. Informed Consent puts doctors in compliance with the ethics requirements of the Nuremburg Code stating that patients are:
➢ To be given complete and accurate information
➢ To be free to make a voluntary
➢ To not be subjected to harassment, coercion or sanctions
“…and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make and understanding and enlightened decision.”
It’s evident that countless doctors are in violation of a global law, resulting in a catastrophic health epidemic. If your child suffers from autism,
reproductive issues, food allergies, asthma or eczema, it’s likely the result of a vaccine injury. (A heavily censored study comparing unvaccinated versus vaccinated children can be read byclicking here.)
single industry has managed to convince an entire population that injecting poison is necessary to survive. Our elected officials are doing nothing to stop it, and the corporate mainstream media
charade refuses to report about it. Meanwhile, taxpayers foot the bill for Big Pharma’s death and destruction. Nearly $4 billion dollars has been paid to victims of vaccine injury by way of
the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
It has been almost three years since the first of thirteen vaccine whistleblowers stepped forward. Dr.
William Thompson, a veteran scientist who maintains his employment at the CDC despite his federal whistleblower status, admitted that he and his colleagues destroyed evidence
proving a link between vaccines and autism. And then there’s the CDC SPIDER (Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence, and Ethics
in Research), which is the biggest whistleblower event in medical history.
SPIDER’s twelve scientists issued an August 2016 letter revealing extremely nefarious and troubling
happenings at the CDC. It also confirms that the fraudulent 2004 MMR study is not an isolated example of the corruption and scandal that shrouds the agency.
“We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of
ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being
circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception. Some senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone
these behaviors. Others see it and turn the other way. Some staff are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right. We have representatives from across the agency that witness this
unacceptable behavior. It occurs at all levels and in all of our respective units…We are asking that you do your part to help clean up this house!”
Apparently, thirteen whistleblowers is insufficient for members of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee to take
a meeting last summer, Rep. Jason Chaffetz asked us to spread the word that the constant calls and emails his office was receiving demanding the subpoena of Dr. Thompson was “distracting from the
investigation.” He and his OGR colleagues have had nine months to conduct an appropriate investigation, subpoena a federal whistleblower, hold press conferences, raid the CDC,