7 False Claims about Cancer by the Medical / Pharmaceutical Establishment
-by Paul A Philips
False claim 1 -The idea that cancer is a disease of the modern western world
Cancer has been known since ancient times. However, it has gone from a rare disease as it was during the turn of the 1900's to a rising global epidemic in modern times. The cancer establishment gives the impression that its true causes are unknown and plays down the idea that it is a disease of the modern western world.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Well documented evidence has been produced to show that cancer causes have been known for years. In recent decades, there have been growing onslaughts of DNA-changing carcinogenic circumstances.
Examples include rising numbers of: Food chemicals; water and air pollutants; vaccinations; GMO's and medications...
It practically ignores the findings that isolated indigenous tribes such as the Hunsas, Karakorum or Azerbaijanis had been virtually cancer free, with evidence strongly suggesting that this was because the spoils of the Western world had been absent...
False claim 2 -The medical/pharmaceutical approach is the only real way to treat cancer
In line with the 'mechanistic approach to medicine' the cancer establishment generally ignores anything outside of this health model: Little or not enough attention is given to the highly effective roles of diet, the mind-body influence, exercise and environmental toxicity...
False claim 3 -There are no natural health based successful cures
Following on from 2, it beggars belief to me how anyone could not seriously look into the very factors that address the very fabric of our being: diet, the mind-body influence, exercise and environmental toxicity... and how they influence our health. This blatant ignoring has made the cancer establishment blind to the evidence suggesting the contrary and how the natural health based model with its principles has been highly successful.
False claim 4 -Natural health based innovators / pioneers are just
...those innovators / pioneers who have taken on natural health approaches related to the above 4 factors have had quite a hard time from the cancer establishment. While there is no 100% cure for cancer the overwhelming evidence shows that their approaches can be successful. At times, more successful than the cancer establishment and credit should therefore be given to these individuals where it's due.
False claim 5 -There is no suppressing of alternative cures
Anyone can Google a number of innovators / pioneers with their natural health approaches and see that they have had their equipment seized by the medical / pharmaceutical establishment, been taken to court for illegal practices in spite of the fact that they had records and case testimonies to show high cure rates..! The innovators / pioneers had won many court cases because cancer cured individuals care of their practices stood up and testified.
Examples of this include; Stanislaw Burzynski Antineoplaston Therapy, Harry Hoxey herbs, Max Gerson Therapy (now headed by daughter Charlotte Gerson), Royal Rife's cancer machine... it is indeed up to you the reader to research this then decide for yourself.
False claim 6 -The acid / alkaline dietary choice plays no major role in cancer prevention / reversal
...The human body's blood pH lies somewhere in between 7.3 - 7.45. Anything outside this range we'd be dead. Remember, the lower the pH the more acid the blood, which in effect means less oxygen content (read Dr Otto Warburg 1920's) and has the effect of cell degeneration on an individual. Energy is sapped by the body trying to raise the blood pH back to mid-range. This is caused by eating acid junk foods... which also creates a favourable environment for disease such as cancer to set in.
The answer is to eat alkaline foods such as raw greens (spinach, broccoli and asparagus...) to get the pH towards the higher figure in the range, allowing more energy available for enzyme efficiency, metabolic functioning and an environment unfavourable for disease.
False claim 7 -Survival rate and prevention claims... winning the battle
...As a reaction to the rising cancer deaths Richard Nixon US president at the time
in the early 1970's introduced a 'war on cancer' and funding increased hugely. However, the illusory war that followed, in spite of the increased funding for research into Cancer the death rates
continually increased over several decades! Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery have not been that effective. Much has been done to cover up or twist data interpretation related to this to make
results look better. For instance, chemotherapy goes down as successful if results produce tumour shrinkage; even if it's only for a limited time period and the tumour returns stronger (rebound
phenomenon) to eventually kill the patient.
The early detection improvement claim is a myth. That's because no one really knows if the cancer detected will turn out to be malignant or benign... A classic example of this is in mammograms. The only absolute that can be said about mammograms is that it detects cancer.
All in all
A holistic approach would be a step in the right direction incorporating natural health approaches but I can't see the cancer establishment changing their ways from the dogmas of mechanistic medicine. There's too much money to be made from the status quo...